British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba comprise the New West Partnership, an economic powerhouse of more than 11 million people with a combined GDP of over $750 billion. This ambitious agreement represents Canada’s largest interprovincial barrier-free trade and investment market. |
Bid Protest Mechanism
The Parties to the New West Partnership Trade Agreement (NWPTA)
(British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba) have
entered into an agreement to replace NWPTA’s BPM with a new
Bid Protest Mechanism. The BPM entered into force on
January 1, 2019.
Each of these Agreements has different requirements for compliance by procuring entities, as well as different thresholds for covered procurements. The full text of the new Bid Protest Mechanism includes instructions for initiating the BPM. Download frequently asked questions (PDF) >> Should a complainant choose to proceed through the consultation stage of the Bid Protest Mechanism, the complainant is required to identify five potential Arbiters from the following Roster: Current Bid Protest Mechanism Arbiter Roster (PDF) >> The current Bid Protest Mechanism Arbiter and Dispute Resolution Panelist Rates are: 2024 Panelist and Arbiter Remuneration Rates (PDF)>> Final Arbiters ReportsPMH Insights Inc. and Parkland County, April 5, 2017 Parkland Geotechnical Consulting Ltd. and The City of Red Deer, March 1, 2018 Parkland Geotechnical Consulting Ltd. and The Alberta Infrastructure, April 15, 2019 Parker Johnston Industries Ltd. and The Calgary Board of Education, May 2, 2019 Parker Johnston Industries Ltd. and The Calgary Board of Education, May 6, 2019
West-Can Seal Coating Inc. v. Ministry of Highways and
Infrastructure for the Province of Saskatchewan, March 29,
2021
Commercial Truck Equipment Corporation v. Beaver Emergency Services Commission, July 29, 2021 Telus Communications Inc. vs. the Government of Alberta, November 29, 2022 |
Copyright 2019 |